DTV Transition: Does it discriminate? Is it equal opportunity television?

Still ranting on the topic of how our culture is becoming stratified I am kind of getting myself worked up about it. When I wrote my other blog, I had forgotten about the changes taking place in television in the US in 2009 (forgotten isn’t really the word, I have been in denial, deep denial). I think I am okay because I have cable – analog cable – but it’s a pipe and it delivers signal. The point is, I can afford cable. Yet many of my neighbors can’t.

And thus it continues: the plight of the haves versus the have nots.

In this case it raises a real issue that should concern us all. And the quote below nails the question: do we have the right to television?

“The prospect of good, honest, television-loving Americans losing their signal has caused a lot of hand wringing of late. According to a January survey by the National Association of Broadcasters, (only) 79 percent of Americans are aware of the transition. … All this despite a huge information campaign and an incentive program that amounts to an investment by American taxpayers of up to $1.5 billion. … That, to me, raises the question: Do Americans have a right to television? … The question is not meant to be cynical. There is, after all, a public-interest rationale for as many people as possible to have access to the television medium. … Nevertheless, it would be naive to think that television’s primary function in most households is as an emergency alert or learning tool. And it’s illuminating to put the government’s $1.5 billion allocation in perspective. Consider: The proposed 2009 federal budget for adult basic and literacy education is $574.6 million.”
— Glenn Derene, Popular Mechanics’ tech editor, questions the priorities reflected in the spending to get Americans ready for the digital TV conversion next year.

What is the benefit of over-the-air broadcast? Safety? Speed? Accessibility?

As I talked about this with my mom, she reminded me that we all use our portable televisions when there’s an earthquake and the power is out. It was huge for me in San Francisco in 1989. I didn’t have power for a few days but I could see what was happening on my battery powered television.

When September 11 happened, we all gathered round the television to watch events unfold and understand what – if anything – we needed to do. I believe over-the-air broadcast television is a public utility and cutting people off – people who may need it most because they don’t have access to computers, mobile phones or other technology – puts part of the population at risk including the elderly and the poor. Who is going to make sure my elderly neighbor is hooked up? What about the family in the trailer who doesn’t even have a phone?

And one more thing about what Glenn says above, is anyone else outraged that we are actually spending our tax dollars on subsidies that are helping cable companies get more business?! And we are spending three times more on this than on helping adults learn how to read!

Is it too late to cancel this party? To make it stop and leave everything alone? I would love to hear your thoughts.

DTV 2009: Don’t know what I am talking about? Here’s the scoop:

On February 17, 2009, the era of analog broadcast television in the United States will end. The nation’s full power television stations will complete their transition to an all-digital system. While this change will mark the end of the traditional analog method of broadcasting over-the-air television, it won’t signal the end of free broadcast television, and your favorite broadcast programs and local television stations will still be available…

All you have to do is follow these easy instructions (yeah right): http://www.dtvtransition.org/.


2 thoughts on “DTV Transition: Does it discriminate? Is it equal opportunity television?

  1. Clearly you are bright enough to figure out ways to stay “connected” to the world (and congrats on the earning power – I have a feeling more people might experience that if they turned off the boob tube!) but what about the elderly who rely on the television to get information. They are already at a disadvantage. I have no idea how they will navigate this change if they don’t have family members to help them.

  2. Correlation does not imply causation, but in the 12 years I didn’t have a television in my household my gross income increase by 4 fold. I don’t feel as if I missed anything by not regularly viewing broadcast TV in the 90s. Especially if one is living in an urban, there are many other opportunities for entertainment and education. And of course there are those quaint things called books and libraries. 🙂

Comments are closed.